Not sure what to think about the Kevin Nash storyline.
He all but said Triple H is the one who asked him to "stick it" to whoever won the Undisputed WWE title.
But no confrontation between Triple H and Punk last nite?
If I were Punk, and indeed pissed, I would have made sure I talked to him then and there.
Perhaps they were waiting on that to build it up(?)
To me it just seemed incomplete.
I did like the back and forth between Punk and Nash, just not sure where it is heading, and if it will have the desired payoff.
I've been a fan of Cena since he debuted, but I find his act is a little stale.
Lately I have been rooting for whoever is facing him (except the Miz!) because his opponents to me, are far more interesting.
Last nite was the first time that what he said actually pissed me off!
Calling out Alberto Del Rio for cashing in the MITB contract after Punk and Cena's match and after Nash laid Punk out.
Del Rio wasn't the first MITB winner to take advantage of a weakened Champion, and he won't be the last.
Cena was furious that Del Rio had done that, but yet, he never accused Edge of doing the same.
I admire Cena for being the "bell cow" that he is, and knowing how devoted to the WWE he is, but I'm finally seeing that enough is enough.
Having him continuously win the title is selling the other capable wrestlers short and hurting the product.
I'm hoping Del Rio keeps the belt for a good amount of time, but I know better.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
No comments:
Post a Comment